I'll let you choose this year's rules. I'll take care of the rest of the organisation, I trust you with that.
I've never taken the time to study the rules in depth, I've got all kinds of other things to prepare and it's a lot of work.
That's fair, and in a perfect world that's how things should be. Organizers should be different people from those setting the rules, and both should not even be active players, at least not during the tournament they're organizing/ruling.
10 years ago, when I was tired of being FFSMK president / host, this was not only because I had the feeling it prevented me from getting better results. I felt like it was not entirely fair to have somebody ruling the overall event being a regular medal contender at the same time. I had discussed this with Baptiste (now retired from the community) and we had agreed that FFSMK should be ruled by non-active / retired players so they could focus on the organization, the rules, without being affected on track. It should be the same for every "non-playing" role during the championships: players should just be there to play AND help if possible, but they should never be in charge of anything related to the competition they are attending. This is also why we had this FFSMK suscriber thing that enabled the possibility for players to give their vote about rules discussions.
Unfortunately, this community never managed to have (enough) people deeply implied enough in the rules and the organization process who didn't want/care to attend any mode at the same time. Patrick kinda sacrificed himself for the sake of the results file but once again, this should not happen this way

EDIT : je viens juste de réaliser que Lenaing a émis plus ou moins le même avis (en le résumant bien davantage que moi), merci !
Le mieux étant peut être que les gens du staff ne soient pas des gens qui souhaitent participer peut être, mais il faudrait trouver des volontaires (et ça, je comprends que ça ne soit pas facile)